12th February – Board 15. North/South Game.
Dealer South.
Sometimes a bid should not
be taken at face value when there is an inference that partner cannot hold
support there. Even so confusion can often ensue!
|
North:
S J 5 4 3
H J 6
D J 9 8 5
C A 6 2
|
|
West:
S K Q 6
H A K Q 8 4 3
D 7
C Q 8 7
|
|
East:
S A 9 8 7 2
H 9 5 2
D A Q 6 3
C 4
|
|
South:
S 10
H 10 7
D K 10 4 2
C K J 10 9
5 3
|
|
West
|
North
|
East
|
South
|
|
|
|
No
|
1H
|
No
|
1S
|
No
|
3H
|
No
|
4D
|
No
|
4S
|
No
|
4NT
|
No
|
5S
|
No
|
6H
|
End
|
When
East bids 4D he might be doing it for one of two reasons. He might of course
hold the suit even though he must be aware that his partner doesn’t because he
had the chance to bid it himself and didn’t! More likely it is an advance
cue-bid in support of hearts but whatever the case West can hardly not show his
good support for spades. 4NT now becomes ambiguous because it is not clear to
West which suit partner wants as trumps but following the principle that when a
suit has been bid by both sides that is the agreed suit then that should ease
West’s worries. By a happy coincidence the responses are the same whether it is
hearts or spades as trumps and East can finally come clean by supporting
hearts. There is nothing to the play, in either suit as it happens, and +980
should be a great score.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If using the 'Anonymous' option for adding a comment please write your name in the comment box so we all know who has commented. You will also need to copy the word shown before you can publish your comment (to reduce spam.) Thanks, Dave.