2nd July – Board 2. North/south
Game. Dealer East.
No all bids fit snugly into
a prescribed pattern and sometimes you have to make a choice between two
slightly off kilter possibilities. The hand below was a case in point.
|
North:
S 7 6 3
H 2
D K 9 3
C K Q 10 7 6 2
|
|
West:
S J 9
H K 9 8 6 4
D A Q 6
C 9 8 5
|
|
East:
S Q 5 4 2
H Q 10 7 5 3
D 8 4
C A 4
|
|
South:
S A K 10 8
H A J
D J 10 7 5
2
C J 3
|
|
West
|
North
|
East
|
South
|
|
|
No
|
1NT
|
No
|
2S
|
No
|
3C
|
End
|
|
|
|
I
think for several reasons that South should open that hand with 1NT. Opposite
North will transfer to clubs, giving South the opportunity to deny a top honour
by completing the transfer. (With a good holding in clubs he would bid 2NT.) As
it happens ten tricks are an easy make and par is attained. So why 1NT instead
of 1D? There are several reasons, with the main one being that over a response
of 2C you are more or less forced to rebid that feeble suit as 2S would be a
reverse and game forcing to boot. Also an opening 1D gives West the opportunity
to come in at a low level with 1H. Not only that but should East/West
eventually buy the contract in 3H North is likely to kick off with a disastrous
diamond lead – the only suit to give away the contract.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If using the 'Anonymous' option for adding a comment please write your name in the comment box so we all know who has commented. You will also need to copy the word shown before you can publish your comment (to reduce spam.) Thanks, Dave.