13th June – Board 23: Game All. Dealer South.
Clever conventions are all
very well but they can sometimes be of use to the opponents too. That should
have been the case with the following hand when, after a bright start, the
defence somewhat lost their way.
North:
S 10 9 6
H 6 4 2
D A 4 3
C Q J 5 3
|
||
West:
S 8 4 2
H 9 5
D K 9 8 6 2
C K 9 8
|
East:
S A Q 7 3
H K Q J 8 7
D Q J 10
C 10
|
|
South:
S K J 5
H A 10 3
D 7 5
C A 7 6 4
2
|
West
|
North
|
East
|
South
|
1NT
|
|||
No
|
No
|
2C
|
No
|
2D
|
No
|
2H
|
End
|
East
has a close call between doubling 1NT or using an Asptro type bid of 2C
showing, in this instance, a hand with five hearts and another four card
undisclosed suit. Maybe with the opposition vulnerable double has the edge
because a one-trick defeat will attain the magic +200, always a good result at
pairs, whereas a non-vulnerable +100 will lose out to any E/W pair making 2H.
At any rate 2H it was and South found the best lead of the seven of diamonds.
North did well by ducking this and declarer led a top trump, won by South who
continued diamonds and then got his ruff. So far, so good. But by this time
South knows that East started with five hearts, three diamonds and another
four-card suit. Can it be clubs? No, because then his partner would have
started with six spades and would have transferred over 1NT so declarer is
marked with a 4-5-3-1 distribution. Armed with this knowledge after obtaining
his ruff South should have cashed the ace of clubs and exited with the ten of
trumps. Left to play spades from his hand declarer would have suffered a one
trick defeat, but sadly for N/S it didn’t go quite like that.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If using the 'Anonymous' option for adding a comment please write your name in the comment box so we all know who has commented. You will also need to copy the word shown before you can publish your comment (to reduce spam.) Thanks, Dave.