5th August – Board 8: Love. Dealer West.
North:
S A Q 7
H A K J 3
D 7 3
C K 10 9 6
| ||
West:
S K J 8 6 4
H Q 9 7
D Q 10 8 4
C 3
|
East:
S 2
H 6 4 2
D K J 9 5 2
C 8 7 5 4
| |
South:
S 10 9 5 3
H 10 8 5
D A 6
C A Q J 2
|
West
|
North
|
East
|
South
|
No
|
1H
|
No
|
1S
|
No
|
2NT
|
No
|
3H*
|
No
|
3S**
|
No
|
3NT
|
End
|
** In similar fashion opener denies having five hearts but in turn is asking if his partner has a five-card spade suit, in which case the correct contract would be 4S. Again North would only have three card support because he would have raised immediately if he had more.
The play in 3NT is interesting on a diamond lead. With only eight tricks on top it would appear that the fate of the contract depends on a successful finesse in either spades or hearts, but declarer can combine his chances to some extent by playing off the ace and king of hearts first. If the queen of hearts is doubleton in either hand then there is no need for a finesse at all. As it happens the contract is essentially declarer proof.
As the culprit for 4S - 2, we got to 2NT then Chris bi 3NT and I paniced over my two small diamonds and thought with AQx of partners suit I should put him into that.
ReplyDeleteYes, I saw that. As I say though I think Chris should have bid 3H to give you the chance of bidding 3S, then all possibilities are taken into account. You sort of double-crossed yourself in the end. 4S isn't the worse contract in the world, but a bit unlucky with the break. And the couples who were in 4H had no trouble by and large, where things were much more friendly.
ReplyDelete