Who Dares Wins

15th July – Board 26: Game all. Dealer East
North:
S A K J 9
H 10 6
D A 7 5
C 8 7 5 4
West:
S none
H A Q 9 8 7 3
D K 10 8 3 2
C J 3
East:
S Q 8 7 6 4 3
H J 4
D Q J 9 6 4
C none
South:
S 10 5 2
H K 5 2
D none
C A K Q 10 9 6 2
There were a number of results on the hand shown above, and no surprise there looking at all four hands. In fact North must have felt short-changed, possessing as he did the only normal looking hand of the bunch. What do you think is the par contract, and by that I mean what is the contract that should be attained if everyone played perfectly? Hard to believe but it is 7C doubled -2 by N/S giving E/W a score of 500, because E/W are cold for 6D! Of course to arrive at that result would be superhuman and I would have thought that a contract of 5D doubled + 1 by E/W would be more likely as they ‘save’ over 5C. Who knows how the auction might proceed but perhaps the following wouldn’t be too far-fetched:
West
North
East
South
1C
1H
Dbl*
No
3C
3D
4D**
5D
No
No
Dbl
All Pass

* = sputnik double showing just four spades
** = cue-bid in support of clubs

I know the result is rubbish but sometimes things are just too hard. However there are a number of things to mention in the above auction. First of all I would reject any notion of opening the East hand with a weak two. The suit is too bad and there might be a slam on in diamonds!! Even if West had a two-suited type overcall available I think it should be rejected in favour of bidding the six-card major first. North should double to show a four-card spade suit. Remember that if you are playing Sputnik doubles then a bid of 1S in this situation should show at least a five-carder so that partner can raise on three card support if the next hand prempts in hearts. South is a bit too good just to bid 2C so he makes a jump rebid instead and West introduces his second suit. North has the perfect response by cue-bidding in support of clubs and East completes the barrage by bidding what he eventually would over 5C. From there on it’s pretty much guesswork but I imagine South would make a forcing pass causing his partner to make the final – wrong – decision. Not surprisingly nothing like that ever happened.

3 comments:

  1. Wow, what an interesting hand and an educating commentary.

    Thursday's winner

    ReplyDelete
  2. As South I got to 5 clubs, but made six (E/W were a little pusillanimous perhaps!). I don't see how we could have got to 6 or 7 clubs other than by competitive play with fingers crossed!
    I see you have stars against the North responses, but I cannot find the explanation. I assume that the double and the 4 clubs are asking South to say more about the hand??
    Yours etc
    Intrigued of Hampshire (Peter)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the comment Peter. You did well to make 6C - I guess the ace of hearts was led- but of course the defence can always take two tricks if they remain passive. You would only want to be in 7C if the opposition bid 6D because it would be a cheap sacrifice, but of course it would be unrealistic to know that. As I mention in the blog a much more likely result is to double them at the five level which they would make with an overtrick even though they have a total point count of only sixteen. Sorry about the asterisks. I put them in but failed to annotate them. Have put that right now. Should have mentioned you and Chris in dispatches for coming 3rd. A belated 'well done!'

    ReplyDelete

If using the 'Anonymous' option for adding a comment please write your name in the comment box so we all know who has commented. You will also need to copy the word shown before you can publish your comment (to reduce spam.) Thanks, Dave.